Talk:Mohammad Jafar Mahallati

Bias in Accusation section
The 3rd and 4th paragraphs of the accusation section (in particular the 3rd) seem as though they may have been written from a biased perspective. Both paragraphs attempt to argue that Dr. Mahallati is guilty. I think these sections provide interesting information but it would be good if it were re-written in a more neutral manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianhi7919 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Currently it seems to be garbled with with irrelevant information. I don't know if it could be arguing that the subject is guilty while it is largely unclear what he is or isn't guilty of: "having a role" isn't helpful to anyone. It's evident that Amnesty International wrote a lot of letters, but frankly all that is evidence of is that Amnesty International wrote a lot of letters. I've tagged the section as unclear for this reason.--Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 08:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * After going through the sources cited, few of them actually say what the article is saying. It's seeming like a violation of WP:NOR. Not sure though, second pair of eyes? Tallowbreeched (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * After looking at it again, I re-wrote this section to reflect what more reliable sources are saying. Many of those sources were primary documents and was definitely a violation of WP:NOR. I also directly cited what the claims were of Mahallati and the protestors, so I removed the unclear banner.Tallowbreeched (talk) 15:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)