Talk:Mojave Desert/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, but this one's gonna have to be a quickfail.
 * The climate section is almost completely unsourced
 * weather2travel.com is used as a source for temperature data; it is an unreliable source
 * the geography section is unsourced, and also incomplete. We'll want to know about specific natural features
 * Cities and regions is mainly unsourced
 * The natural features such as Devils Playground in the cities and features section could possibly go in the geography section or something like that
 * Highways and major roads is a single sentences; needs expansion
 * Parks and tourism is largely unsourced
 * the list of musuems should be a prose paragraph
 * the flora section needs expanded
 * The fauna section should not just be a giant list
 * Soil and plant conditions and protection sections are both unsourced and too short. More detail is needed on these topics
 * The West Mojave plan litigation is undue weight.
 * Too many see also links - see MOS:SEEALSO
 * What makes constructioncompany.com a reliable source?
 * what makes parlorsongs.com a reliable source
 * All items in lead should be in body, there is stuff like the native name that is unique to the lead.

This is nowhere near to the GA criteria, so I will have to quickfail it, unfortunately. Hog Farm Talk 23:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the helpful criticism. I will begin working on this immediately. AurumIsGold (talk) 23:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)