Talk:Mokuʻula

Mausoleum
Needs section. Viriditas (talk) 12:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Infobox lake
Infobox lake Viriditas (talk) 12:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Nāga
The moʻo of the Hawaiians and the Nāga of the Hindus appears to be the same. Has anyone noticed this? Viriditas (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

3+ Revert Rule editing practices
I've noticed that your editing history is rife with multiple reversions and additions of material. This could be seen by some editors as a violation of the three-revert rule. I suggest that when editing an article, try to use the preview button or open up multiple screens if you feel the need to add info after the fact. Or something that that doesn't require you to go back, add a/or remove material. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 08:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand my actions and none of them can be considered 3+ revert which is edit warring which is not something I would not do. Reverting once or twice is not subject to the rule if there is just cause. Users are allow to revert other editors content; it's the continual reverting without discussion and edit warring that is a problem and should be avoided. I see the image your are using as a poor one with no value to the article which is why I removed it in the first place. I assumed you were an IP address for a while. Let's discuss that part in the talk page of the article because you have not been anymore forthright than me in the edit summaries when revering my edits either.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I did not see any notice except your reversion of my edit on the article. After I saw the reversion, I then saw the messages you gave me, so I don't know why Wikipedia failed to inform me of your messaging given I was waiting for a response for sometime. My images are of when there were archeological surveys in 2012, which gives an idea of how the site is today, and has a clear infomation board that identifies the site as Moku'ula. I think this image or the other one is sufficient enough given the island is buried, than using an image of a ballpark or your image, which is of lower quality than mine. Compare that image to one on the Friends of Moku'ula site.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Moved this discussion from my talk page.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Image of site
User:293.xx.xxx.xx why are you insisting on retaining an image of a fence when there is a more recognizable image of the stone platform and even one of the plaque which also parts of the archaeological site in the image. The only reason I can see is the fact that you've upload it to the common which would be a conflict of interest in my opinion. Please state your case for the current image. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Google image result for Mokuula --- The stone platform is the clear iconic landmark.


 * You said "Image is of poor quality and does not identify a significant landmark on property." --- However, the pohaku platform is a significant landmark on the site. I have spoken with the Friends of Mokuula and they have stated that this platform is of religious importance on the site. Your image is just of a fence in area where they are digging right now. I won't revert anymore. If you still disagree or remain unresponsive except to only return to revert my edits, I think we need to take this for Rfc or Wikipedia:Third opinion because I seriously think you only want this image because your the uploader.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Second suggestion. Would comprise on the second image showing the pohaku and the fenced in area?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Can we agree to just include both images? I don't mind if the one I am suggesting takes a second place.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mokuʻula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723205039/http://www.mauimagazine.net/Maui-Magazine/January-February-2009/Lahaina-rsquos-Invisible-Island/ to http://www.mauimagazine.net/Maui-Magazine/January-February-2009/Lahaina-rsquos-Invisible-Island/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)