Talk:Molly Brant/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Magic ♪piano 23:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I know it's a nit, but I had to find something to complain about.  Magic ♪piano 22:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Accessdates added. I've been looking through flickr for any statues or signs for Brant. There are a few on there, but they're all copyrighted pictures. I'll send a message to those that took the photos to try and get the copyright changed, but no guarantees. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 02:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Sure thing. Passing...  Magic ♪piano 14:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)