Talk:Moncton/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I am doing the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project.

I find the article to be basically good. For an article of this size the lead is a bit underdeveloped. See WP:LEAD for insight into this. I note that the article has gone through three FAC reviews in the last year, which has helped to keep the article current and sources fresh. I will keep it at GA. H1nkles (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)