Talk:Monetary Policy Committee (United Kingdom)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Image complies to fair use requirements.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Image complies to fair use requirements.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments:
 * Numbers over nine should be written numerically, and up to nine, written out. E.g. It comprises 8 members, only 5 days, 2 years, etc.
 * Hyphens are used instead of dashes, see WP:DASH.
 * There are some low-level grammar issues like "most commonly via the setting the rate". Check for other similar issues.
 * Perhaps the former members section could be in two columns.

Summary: There are just some small minor issues that need to be addressed before it can be passed as a Good Article. I will allow up to seven days for these issues to be fixed.

Final summary: Thank you so much for all your hard work in helping make this a better article. I have split the membership section into two columns, I feel that it looks neater this way. If you disagree, you may change it back. I am now confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 06:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)