Talk:MoneyWeek

Tags
I've tagged this article for not establishing the notability of the article, only using self refs, and not telling us what outside viewpoints of this company are. Its website is currently on WP's blacklist for spam. NJGW (talk) 15:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Reference to MoneyWeek's ABC-certified circulation now added. If the self ref/notability point is still a concern, suggest the entry for Investor's Chronicle is also flagged in this way, as this entry also shares the same issues. Other external mentions of Moneyweek:


 * - The Times blog
 * - ISSN number
 * - The Guardian: "The independently published finance weekly, Money Week, registered growth of 14.9% year on year to 35,794; leaping ahead of Financial Times Group's weekly Investors Chronicle, which fell 8.9% compared to the first half of 2007 to 31,919."


 * With the above in mind, suggest notability tags removed. Dami99 (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Please read wp:Notability for information about how to establish notability of a topic. NJGW (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Having read the above, suggest the following recent, additional third party mentions of this topic would constitute notability when taken with previous examples above.most recent audited ciculation figures for July - December 2008 Dami99 (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I take it you didn't read the Notability policy. It says ""Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail."  Circulation info about a magazine isn't detailed info about the magazine.  NJGW (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * As asked on deletion talk page: can you give a specific example of what, hypothetically, would be deemed significant coverage in this instance? A third party article directly about this magazine (by another magazine)? Dami99 (talk) 22:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That would be a good start. NJGW (talk) 04:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * What else would you suggest? Dami99 (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Anything and everything that is a wp:RS (lots of tips at that link) that could be called "Significant coverage" and which "address the subject directly in detail." NJGW (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Domain is blacklisted
How does this have an article and links to the site when I cannot even reference one of their articles as I get a spam filter notice because the site is blacklisted? Daniel Christensen (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.moneyweek.com
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 01:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)== Blacklisted Links Found on MoneyWeek ==

Cyberbot II has detected links on MoneyWeek which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.moneyweek.com
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on MoneyWeek
Cyberbot II has detected links on MoneyWeek which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.moneyweek.com
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MoneyWeek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222034108/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=21620&sectioncode=1 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=21620&sectioncode=1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922200005/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=41927&c=1 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=41927&c=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

COI edit request from BENFP

 * What I think should be changed:

Par 2 delete whole par

Par 3 change to: For the period January to December 2023, the magazine had an Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) certified combined print & digital circulation of 47,341

Par 5 Delete: “headed by Bill Bonner, who contributed a weekly column in the magazine.”

Par 8 add to end: In 2020 Dennis Publishing, including MoneyWeek, was bought by Future plc.

Par 9 change to: MoneyWeek is edited by Andrew Van Sickle. Previous editors include John Stepek and Merryn Somerset Webb. Ban in China - delete as this refers to a different publication See also: Delete “International Living” as irrelevant

In the sidebar box: Change Editor in chief to Editor: Andrew Van Sickle

Change circulation from 46,498 (December 2016) to 47,341 (December 2023)

Add new cover image


 * Why it should be changed:

Much of the information is out of date


 * References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

BENFP (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)