Talk:Money Can't Buy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll take this, should have this to you within a day or two and will mainly focus on copyediting issues. Thanks, ☠ Jag  uar  ☠ 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

 * The lead summarises the article well, so I couldn't find any problems here. One thing I would suggest however is that the second paragraph could expand on what critics thought of the show?
 * Added


 * Can the opening of the Broadcasts and live recording section be expanded? It seems too short that it disrupts flow
 * That was all the information I could find regarding the concert's broadcast.


 * "On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, a television channel in the United Kingdom" - cut to On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, in the United Kingdom
 * Added


 * "In the United States, it was released on 7 September" - on what format? DVD? Television?
 * It's only available as a DVD. But I mentioned it nonetheless.


 * "Commercially, the DVD was successful." - was it successful everywhere? Worldwide or just some countries?
 * I removed the sentence completely

On hold
This is a good article; it is well written and comprehensive, very worthy of becoming a GA. The concerns are very minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and once those issues are addressed we'll take another look. Regards ☠ Jag  uar  ☠ 14:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I hope your concerns are addressed to your satisfaction. Thank you for the review --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Close - promoted
Thanks for addressing them, I think that's it for now. This article meets the criteria, so promoting ☠  Jag  uar  ☠ 21:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)