Talk:Money in the Bank (2012)

Money in the bank matches
In case most haven't noticed, the lines between brands is extremely blurred anymore. Yes the brand extension is still in effect but superstars can technically appear on any show and compete for any title. Therefore, I suggest we drop labeling the matches as "Raw's Money in the Bank Ladder match" and "SmackDown's Money in the Bank Ladder match" and replace it with "Money in the Bank Ladder match for the WWE Championship contract" and the counterpart "Money in the Bank Ladder match for the World Heavyweight Championship contract" or something of the like that more accurately defines the current situation in WWE. Thoughts?  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 13:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The article already says it that way. As does WWE. InedibleHulk (talk) 15:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I put it that way but people keep changing it back. I would like a consensus to cite.  CRRays Head90  | Get Some! 22:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Your proposal of "MITB for World Title" has my support. Starship.paint (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * WWE says "WWE Championship Money in the Bank", so it is WWE Championship Money in the Bank. It is like "Raw Money in the Bank", no "Money in the Bank for RAW World Title" --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 14:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

You don't need consensus when you have a reliable source (WWE.com) backing a claim, and no contradictory source opposing it. Any change without a source can and should be reverted. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:00, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I've made it clear in the past that I'm not really that interested in current PPVs or their articles. The above comment begs the question, however: wouldn't the use of wwe.com for something associated with WWE be considered a primary source?RadioKAOS (talk) 07:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course, but there's nothing wrong with that in this case. From WP:OR:A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 10 July 2012
The World HeavyWeight Championship match is a Triple Threat with Sheamus Vs Alberto Del Rio Vs Dolph Ziggler Please Allow to Change or Change by Ur Editors

114.79.135.116 (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Reception Section
Guys, this is my first time writing anything on Wikipedia and didn't want to edit without saying this first, but the below quote from the article isn't truthful at all. The event got an 8/10 and there's no mention of the Punk/Bryan match being the worst match. In fact it got the highest rating of all the matches for that night...

-- Money In The Bank (2012) received negative reviews. TheWrestleReview awarded the event a score of 1.0 out of 10,[10] stating that "The Punk / Bryan match was was the worst match of the night and Sheamus / Del Rio was a pleasant surprise. Both of the MITB matches were average by MITB standards, meaning that they were very good." -- Megajenius (talk) 16:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)