Talk:Mongolarachne chaoyangensis

Clearly a Hoax
I think it should be considered that this article is more about the hoax of the fossil being a spider, rather than being tentative about it's validity. Source 1 is confident in the fossil being painted on, and the further study is to distinguish what kind of crawfish the fossil is and not the validity of the spider. I think this article should reflect that better, instead of being formatted as actual science this article should be labled hoax and link to what they think the crawfish might be. ActuallyAsterisk42 (talk) 20:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)