Talk:Monism and dualism in international law

Human rights
I wonder whether human rights are a good example. Human rights by definition claim universality, in other words, they always apply, even without codification, or in a dualistic system. Of course, whether all alleged human rigts really are universal. It is a fundamental philosophical and ethical matter what rights are universal. The existence of a codification in a treaty is immaterial for that purpose. There is also a development of perceptions on human rights in course of history. The very emergence of human rights as a legal concept is pretty recent. But for the purpose of this lemma, if a right is considered a (universal) human right, it applies regardless of the system, imho. A added this to the discussion page rather than the actual article because I expect international law experts to be able to further substantiate my argument. Rbakels (talk) 07:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Some errors in the "Examples" section
The first quote in that section doesn't have a reference (it also lacks a closing quotation mark).

Also Germany is not a monist country — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:AB0:B600:FDFB:FDAF:E34:4750 (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC)