Talk:Monoon longifolium

pk

Requested move 31 August 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Polyalthia longifolia → Monoon longifolium – Name has changed: see page content and POWO. This is a widely-planted species in Asia and the page has substantial content, so checking with other editors ...

– Roy Bateman (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Jerm (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * After 3 weeks - assume no objection so move done ... Roy Bateman (talk) 07:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

In Article Contradiction?
The following two paragraphs seem to be in direct contradiction to one another. The first, from the introduction, claims that the tree requires trimming to attain its decorative shape. The second, from 'In British India', states that pruning is not required to achieve aforementioned decorative state. 'The cultivated, column-like pendula form can appear to have no branches, but in fact a non-hybrid M. longifolium allowed to grow naturally (without trimming the branches out for decorative reasons) grows into a normal large tree giving plenty of shade.' 'It does not require pruning in order to maintain its tall, straight, main trunk with short, drooping branches.' RobotBoy66 (talk) 08:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)