Talk:MonsterMMORPG

Ok I need help about modifying this page properly References list
 * http://www.siliconera.com/2015/01/15/meet-the-student-who-created-the-biggest-fan-made-pokmon-mmorpg-for-his-thesis-project/
 * http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/23/the-joystiq-indie-pitch-monster-mmorpg
 * http://www.kpopstarz.com/articles/165644/20150119/pokemon-mmorpg.htm
 * http://www.techshout.com/alternatives/2012/13/games-like-pokemon/
 * http://www.mmogames.com/game/monster-mmorpg/
 * http://monster-mmorpg.browsergamez.com
 * http://mmohuts.com/game/monster-mmorpg // they are moving pages atm so this page unavailable right now
 * http://www.onrpg.com/games/monstermmorpg
 * http://www.whatmmorpg.com/review/monster-mmorpg.php
 * http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm/game/731/MonsterMMORPG.html
 * http://www.gamespot.com/monstermmorpg/
 * http://www.indiedb.com/games/monstermmorpg/
 * http://www.ign.com/wikis/monster-mmorpg
 * http://freewebgame360.blogspot.com.tr/2013/06/monster-mmorpg-review.html
 * http://gameslikefinder.com/monster-mmorpg/
 * http://www.baixaki.com.br/download/monster-mmorpg.htm
 * http://xmmorpg.com/free-online-mmo-mmorpg-games/monster-mmorpg/
 * http://www.ag.ru/games/monstermmorpg
 * http://www.gameguyz.com/browser-games/rpg/monstermmorpg.html
 * http://newrpg.com/browser-games/monster-mmorpg/
 * http://games.de/pc/spiele/pc/monster-mmorpg/news/monster-mmorpg-180199
 * http://www.rslclk.com/2014/08/mmorpg-sevenler-icin-iki-turk-yapimi-oyun/
 * http://oyungezer.com.tr/haber/38113-monster-ve-pokemon-pets
 * http://frpnet.net/haberler/oyun-haberleri/monster-mmorpg-tarayici-tabanli-canavar-savas-oyunu
 * http://www.merlininkazani.com/MMORPG_takipcilerine_ilginc_bir_oyun-haber-76144p1.html
 * http://www.haberimport.com/haber/tarayici-tabanli-100-yerli-yapim-online-multiplayer-rol-yapma-oyunu-monster-mmo-400808.htm
 * http://www.indir.com/haberler/turk-gelistiriciden-web-tabanli-ucretsiz-mmorpg-oyunlari
 * http://www.andropedi.com/turkce-online-pokemon-oyunu-monster-mmorpg-v2/
 * http://www.teknolojioku.com/haber/tarayici-tabanli-100-yerli-yapim-online-multiplayer-rol-yapma-oyunu-monster-mmorpg-20313.html
 * https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.monstermmorpg.pokemon
 * http://game4v.com/game-online/monstermmorpg-lua-chon-tuyet-voi-cho-ai-dam-me-pokemon-174966.g4v
 * http://www.gamershell.com/news_173095.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlineGamesExpert (talk • contribs) 14:24, 1 April 2015‎ (UTC)


 * I would suggest reading Identifying reliable sources and WikiProject Video games/Sources for guidelines on the sites that we find valuable. I removed about 2/3 of the "sources" as they were game linkfarm landing pages, user reviews, and sources that we have found to be specifically unreliable. There were also quite a few exceptional/self-serving claims sourced to interviews, which are considered self-published sources for our purposes here, so I removed them. The article is closer to WP:VG guidelines and would probably survive a deletion discussion. It could still use some cleanup, though. Woodroar (talk) 01:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here)

Wow this article were checked by many helpers at the chat, they all approved, all suggestions made by them applied, submitted as draft approved, reviewed by editor approved, then i go ask chat about editor review and now primefac tags it as speed deletion, even coffee checked the article when i was preparing draft at the chat. And i believe it has way more authority references than other same category games. I just want to say please check other articles here for references should we speedy delete all of them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_multiplayer_browser_games, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_browser_games. Please check talk page for all references. Just one example : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanki_Online --OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Overturned G4
You've been blocked for harassing (meaning: mass-posting on various uninvolved admins' talk pages) as well as e-mailing them (you e-mailed me, I can't be the only one), as well as displaying a generally combative attitude towards Bbb23. Nonetheless, I think the article needs to be judged on its own merits (and not on who wrote it), and I find that the latest revision has vastly different sourcing that the version AfD's three years ago, which (IMO) makes it inelegible for G4 deletion "per previous discussion". I have restored it (and it will surely shortly be sent to a new AfD, where it may or may not be deleted again). ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  18:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)