Talk:Monster High/Archive 1

This article needs SERIOUS EDITING
Incomplete sentences, misspellings, bad gramar are just the beginning. Can some native english speaker who did better than a C in high school English class please add some respect to this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.116.31 (talk) 07:18, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes it was awful however I have spent some time over the last few weeks expanding and improving the article to a standard hopefully everyone will be happy with. It is still not perfect but is a big improvement of what it was. Sailormoonfan92 (talk) 02:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

This page needs security
Does anyone know how to lock this page? Obviously, too many kids are vandalizing it. I can edit this page on my own because I frequently edit the article. – Ashley

Monster High also has a new colection for the prom dools which have been released in september 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.199.231.244 (talk) 22:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC) I don't think this page should be locked. I mean some kids just read it. Adults like us vandilize it too!(Maddie) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pixinerd (talk • contribs) 23:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Pixinerd adults vandalize Wikipedia too! It's not only children vandalizing even though it's a page about dolls. - Curious678 (talk) 22:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm starting the request for the next round of protection. The time is longer each go around (the last one was two weeks long). Crossing fingers we can get it under control! -Lhall (talk) 22:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I do hope it gets controlled too. Good to know that there will be another lock because I don't think it should need to be locked. Vandalism on Wikipedia hopefully could go down to a very low level one day. -Curious678 (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2011 —Preceding undated comment added 00:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

One IP address is repeatedly vandalizing the page. Typical pattern is adding Bratz names and replacing the legitimate voice actors with celebrities. Also will unreasonably delete items. IP address is 24.87.12.222. If you see this address add something, please correct it asap. If it gets out of hand, I'll send a request to lock the page. I had to retype everything on the Character page to correct this users vandalism Majonopersona (talk) 02:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC) I dont argree with Ashely.Some kids are sensble and dont have time to be "Vandalizing" Most of them are out playing,I think youre being quite offense.-Belinda

Please add references where possible!
There are a lot of unreferenced items on the page, mostly in the product lines area. Where are people getting the info for these? At least for the Spectra character, the surname is incorrect in pre-listings by vendors which are showing up through Amazon, as evidenced by Mattel's trademark registrations (and she was previously known, via listings, as Ghost Girl).

Another example is that the Wikipedia article lists Operetta as an upcoming doll, when she is only mentioned one time, in a doll's diary. Where is the evidence? - Lhall (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There are a lot of edits to this article going on right now, mostly from new editors and IP editors who may not be familiar with Wikipedia sourcing requirements. If you see something clearly inaccurate or speculative, just remove it (I would help out, but I have only a passing familiarity with the subject matter.) If editors keep inserting inaccuracies or speculation it may be necessary to request protetion of the article for a while. Most of the release information probably falls under the What Wikipedia is not guidelines anyway. Siawase (talk) 00:27, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! That's what I figured, so I did remove it. Someone (an unregistered user) re-inserted it all today. I put up Citation Needed tags but if I'm feeling less charitable tomorrow I'll probably just go ahead and remove it... -Lhall (talk) 01:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the whole Operetta thing because it was put up earlier today so I put up Citation needed for it because I'm in a nice mood. For Clawd at least both atamaii.com and Doll News officials are at the Hong Kong Toy Fair and both said Clawd will be coming out on twitter. For Operetta at the current moment we have no proof unless there's new twitter post I haven't seen yet. No matter how much some of these IP editors want her as a doll she isn't going to be for now, even though Mattel's had trademark for her since 2007. -Curious678 (talk) 22:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, Operetta was mentioned in the recent diaries as well, so I guess she could be made into a dol, but I highly doubt that we will see her this year. She will probably be in Wave Four, along with a basic Jackson and a basic Toralei. Nocturnally Jinxed (formaly known as 188.66.76.196 (talk) 15:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC))

Edit request from Melly.k, 28 February 2011
edit semi-protected

Melly.k (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Spectra: Vondergeist or Von Hauntington?
I know that everyone's seen the leaked Spectra pic. And that mattel said it was a prototype. I know why. Because her name is 'Vondergeist' not 'Von Hauntington'. Early listings show her surname to be 'Von Hauntington' but, as of November 5th 2010, her name is trademarked 'Vondergeist'.

Just making my point.

Signed, Nocturnally Jinxed (aka 94.30.31.171 (talk) 15:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC))

Spectra Von hauntington: Much Ado About Nothing
Obviously, we all now know that Spectra Von hauntington was a FAKE. But actually, she was a PROTOTYPE! Get your heads round this people! We WILL be seeing a Spectra doll, but with the proper trademarked name, Vondergeist. Also, according to her leaked picture, there are some minor changes to her dress and she now has a bag.

Signed, Nocturnally Jinxed/94.30.31.171 (talk) 07:52, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Is there a reason why the product list was removed?
The title says it all. Well, is there? Nocturnally Jinxed or, 94.30.31.171 (talk) 13:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I wasn't the one who removed it, but in my opinion, exhaustive lists like that typically fall under the What Wikipedia is not policy. Wikipedia articles should give a summary and overview on a topic, so for products, a few typical examples of products could be described in the article text, but a complete list is out of scope. If it's not already on there, the list could be copied to the dedicated Monster High wiki at http://monsterhigh.wikia.com/ where it surely would be welcome. Siawase (talk) 21:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

I was the one who removed it. Not only is it getting to long, but it was being vandalized more than anything on the page. Majonopersona (talk) 02:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't realise that. Sorry! *sheepishly blushes* Nocturnally Jinxed/ 188.66.76.196 (talk) 14:57, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

how did spectra vondergiest die? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.11.121 (talk) 02:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

There is nothing in her diary that suggestes that she dies, but she does mention her past breaks her heart. I know, becuase I have the doll. Nocturnally Jinxed/188.66.76.196 (talk) 16:41, 6 July 2011 (UTC) (I have a double aura *pulls spooky face*)

A new monster high doll
My kid has a new idea for a new monster high doll she wants you to look at drawing she made do you want to see it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.82.4.237 (talk) 00:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

No. You need to share things like that on a fansite or Facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.80.92.27 (talk) 15:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

27cm tall?
These are American dolls, get that crap out of here. Now I have to use google converter. thanks for nothing wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.242.205 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Link removed?
I posted a link to a Monster High retailer and it has been removed, what it the reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnellis1986 (talk • contribs) 12:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * See WP:LINKSTOAVOID and WP:LINKSPAM, in a nutshell, Wikipedia shouldn't be used for promotion. Siawase (talk) 12:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Sexualization of Children?
This article makes no mention of the dolls in question apparently serving to sexualize children -- has there not been any such controversy or criticism of the dolls because of their apparent overt sexuality? If there has been such criticism, I think it should be noted in the article. I note that the Bratz entry on Wikipedia does note such a controversy about its similar line of apparently sexualized dolls. --Skb8721 (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This article could do with some kind of reception section in general, not just when it comes to sexualization. (Sales number or market share or any such numbers might relatively easy to find?) The media coverage of how sexualized Bratz were was pretty extensive. A quick search of google news archive for Monster High and sexualized found a few results, all commenting on Clawdeen: Nowhere near the coverage Bratz received. Sexualization could be mentioned here (based on these sources) but shouldn't be given the same weight as it's got in the Bratz article. Siawase (talk) 22:31, 31 October 2012 (UTC)