Talk:Monster Truck Madness/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 21:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I'll start the review here. First, I think the lead may need to be at least two to three paragraphs as per WP:LEADSECTION (so far, it's about 23,905). There was also one citation that's already dead, but it's all fixed up. I'll continue reading the article and assess some of the sections before giving a final rating. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Currently, the lead has two paragraphs.  I'm Aya Syameimaru!  I 文々. 新聞  21:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Drive-by comment (appropriately enough): The truck Samson is only mentioned in an image caption. Although it makes sense to only list those of the game's twelve trucks that have Wikipedia articles (which I think is what's being done in "Gameplay"), it might make sense to include the other eight in a footnote. --Usernameunique (talk) 01:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I'm taking your good idea into consideration. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々. 新聞 I  01:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, now I implemented your suggestion into the article with this footnote:

Other monster trucks include Bear Foot, Boogey Van, Carolina Crusher, Monster Patrol, Overkill, Power Wheels Bigfoot, Rampage, Samson, and Wildfoot. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々. 新聞 I 01:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Looks good, . As you can see, I've adjusted it slightly in the article. Also, although it's an uncontroversial statement, I would still add a source to the footnote. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Added a source to the footnote. I'm Aya Syameimaru! I 文々. 新聞 I  05:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I guess the article takes 9-10 minutes to read, and at this point, with 1180 words, can be reviewed with ease I think. «“ I'm Aya Syameimaru! ”I„ 文々. 新聞 “I„ ”» 10:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

All right, here's my assessment of the article.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This article has now been passed. Nice work. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you ready for some down and dirty racing? Go! «“ I'm Aya Syameimaru! ”I„ 文々. 新聞 “I„ ”» 06:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)