Talk:Monster of Aramberri

The author of this article needs to view the article Liopleurodon. The Aramberri monster is not a Liopleurodon, and any currently know pliosaur exceeds 17 m.--Rextron (talk) 22:26, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Not a Juvenile
Following [|this], it may not have been a juvenile at all. And I never heard of the Monster of Aramberri being a liopleurodon. --Ornitholestes (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The page needs several modifications, many informations have no reference and could be the primary belief of some amateurs. I'll help to modify it, it could great that this article has a good rating.

As this specimen is not totally described yet, there's no comparison required with other large pliosaurids species and even less with the extinct megalodon shark. Only some over-enthusiastic media, when the discovery was made in 2002, 10 years ago, have stated this animal to be 20 m long. I have never heard of the 60 tons body mass estimate anywhere. The two research papers about it (2003-2007) talks about an animal about 15 m, which is indeed possibly the largest of all pliosaurs species. It seems that it's actual status as a juvenile have been revised in the 2007 publication.

Be careful with sources, Wiki needs reliable references and in this case, peer reviewed publications or public talks from scientists are welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tehd (talk • contribs) 04:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I know. I think there are so many modifications needed, that it will be a lot of work, epecially without having the Monster of Aramberri scietifically described. but there are several other pliosaurs also estimated at 15m, at least Predator X and Pliosaurus macromerus. It would be good, if there was a complete scientific revision about pliosaurs. --Ornitholestes (talk) 07:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Monster of Aramberri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110110101746/http://plesiosaur.com/database/pdf/Mexican%20giant%20pliosaur%20Buchy%20Frey%20Stinnesbeck%20077-084.pdf to http://www.plesiosaur.com/database/pdf/Mexican%20giant%20pliosaur%20Buchy%20Frey%20Stinnesbeck%20077-084.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928083027/http://www.redesgeo.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=144 to http://www.redesgeo.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=144

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:22, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Monster of Aramberri
I think it is not anything new. I think it might by a known animal from the fossil record.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Aramberri monster fosill anatomy.gif

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:06, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Aramberri monster.jpg