Talk:Mont Orford

Section on proposed condo development was highly biased and looked like it was (poorly) translated from developer's press releases.

Highly biased in favour of the Charest government. The article fails to show the ammount of protest the proposal has received from the population.

More on the mountain?
I'm a new contributor here, and I kind of want to help out here.

I was thinking maybe we could add a little more on the mountain itself?Canswiss (talk) 02:27, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Canswiss


 * Good point. See WikiProject_Mountains to see an outline of the way a mountain article should look. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Mont Orford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20070507/CPACTUALITES/70507071/-1/CPACTUALITES

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)