Talk:Monte Scheinblum

Date of birth
Found this message board profile. Not sure we can use it though. wjemather bigissue 11:05, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Residence
If we cannot identify his current residence reliably, then it should not be included in the infobox. In the early 1990s he was clearly resident in La Quinta, but his 2008 Gateway Tour bio page states he was a resident of Irvine at that time. Also the National Post gives his residence as Newport Coast, but does not give a date. wjemather bigissue 13:03, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The intelligent thing is to give the last confirmed date, with a reflection of the date at which the address was reflected. That is accurate, non-disruptive, and verifiable, which is what we strive for.--Epeefleche (talk) 13:17, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * How about Orange County, California? Bigger area and recent residences fall inside it. wjemather bigissue 13:24, 25 December 2010 (UTC)


 * (Aside). You combative edit summaries are not helpful. There is no time limit here, so I don't see why you are in such a rush to fill out this field on a whim, when it is still under discussion and before we have reached consensus. wjemather bigissue 13:31, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * "There is no time limit" is not a reason to delete a sourced entry. It is verifiable.  It is relevant.  It is dated.  There is no reason to delete it.  Your combative deletions of sourced relevant are not helpful, and your engaging in such conduct as part of your disruptive wikihounding is disruptive.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Your attempts at deflecting attention from the problems with your own contributions are frankly pathetic. I can only suggest you wake up and smell the coffee before your time here is done. wjemather bigissue 04:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)