Talk:Montgomery, Vermont

Removing information regarding flawed health study
The Vermont Dept. of Health now admits that the health study was flawed and inaccurate. So I'm removing that section. As a flawed study, it isn't significant enough to merit mention in this article.

http://healthvermont.gov/enviro/asbestos/vagm-healthstudy.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkwiki (talk • contribs) 11:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Many of the actions taken in history were "wrong" and new ones continue to be. We shouldn't remove it because of that. It upset people for quite some time and the ultimate finding "proves" just the opposite of the accusation and might be raised by any reasonable person reading about asbestos mining that had taken place. It needs to be restored because it answers an important question: Did asbestos mining cause problems in the miner population? Are the tailing remaining today a true threat? Student7 (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd agree with leaving this information in. Use good sources and NPOV and it's fine to keep in there. Jessamyn (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montgomery, Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150523034651/https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)