Talk:Montpelier Hill/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Initial comments
I'm sorry of the apparent lack of progress on this review, I'm not sure where the time went.

I've completed a couple of quick read-throughs of the article and it appears, generally, to be at or about GA-level, so I will not be "quick failing" this nomination.

I'm now doing to carryout a more detailed review, working my way through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. At this point, I will mostly be concentrating on "problems", if any. So if I don't find too many this part of the review will be quite "thin". I hope to have this completed in the next 24 hours or so (perhaps 36 hours, we will see). Pyrotec (talk) 22:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * History -
 * The Hell Fire Club -
 * This subsection looks OK.

...to be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Prehistoric monuments, The Stewards House , Killakee (Lord Massy's) Estate , Carthy’s Castle & Orlagh House -
 * These four subsections look OK.


 * Access and recreation & WP:Lead -
 * I'm happy with these. Pyrotec (talk) 19:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an interesting and informative article. Pyrotec (talk) 20:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)