Talk:Monuments in the United States to Nazi collaborators

Requested move 4 October 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Some contributors think the proposed wording is less awkward, while others think the proposed wording is more ambiguous. (non-admin closure) Rreagan007 (talk) 01:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Monuments in the United States to Nazi collaborators → Monuments to Nazi collaborators in the United States – Less ambiguous word order. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  10:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 02:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Less awkward phrasing, and more in line with similarly titled articles. Mdewman6 (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Support and aligns with Memorials in Canada to Nazis and Nazi collaborators. Longhornsg (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Is Memorials in Canada to Nazis and Nazi collaborators a "support" argument? If anything it sounds like an argument for the current word order. Adumbrativus (talk) 05:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * What's the theory for why the proposed title is less ambiguous? The original rationale behind the current title is to be clearer that the monuments are in the United States and the collaborators are not necessarily in the United States. Adumbrativus (talk) 05:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Adding the wording for the rationale for the move to this current title: "Beyond My Ken moved page Monuments to Nazi collaborators in the United States to Monuments in the United States to Nazi collaborators": remove ambiguity in title as to whether the colllaborators were in the US, or the monuments. Natg 19 (talk) 02:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose. It's the monuments that are in the United States, not the collaborators (who might or might not be). Egsan Bacon (talk) 03:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose. As pointed out above, that would change the meaning. The current title more correctly describes the article content. Station1 (talk) 06:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

On the topic of the Belarusian section
Recently the monument dedicated to the BCC was rennovated, and so far I have not been able to find if the monument's references to the BCC were removed during it's rennovation. Can someone see if it was? 🤓 WeaponizingArchitecture  &#124;  scream at me  🤓 19:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)