Talk:Moondog (1969 album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DadOfTheYear2022 (talk · contribs) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

'GA review''' (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Hello, I'm reviewing this article. All neutrals are currently placeholders, and will be changed once I work on it. DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 16:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Disregard the below comment, I believe that it's properly tagged. Article is good in my eyes.DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Initial Comments

 * I am unfamiliar with the sourcing for images, so the image of the trimba prevents my approval on that part. Otherwise, this looks good. DadOfTheYear2022 (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)