Talk:Moondram Pirai/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 17:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Will review within 4 or 5 days.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Reword "In February 2014, Kamal Haasan, in an interview with The Hindu Business Line, said that when Mahendra narrated the story of Moondram Pirai to him, Haasan listened to Mahendra for about 20 minutes and then told Mahendra to include him in the film,[9] after Mahendra assured Haasan that he would walk away with the applause." It's quite a mouthful.

Reworded. If there are any better words, do suggest them. — Ssven2  speak 2 me 03:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

✅ Actually it means, "performing item numbers". — Ssven2  speak 2 me 03:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC) You have resolved it yourself, doc. — Ssven2  speak 2 me 03:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC) ✅ Removed that portion. Ratnam only states it that way. "Focused purpose" may refer to information about his fellow dons. — Ssven2  speak 2 me 03:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC) ✅ resolved. — Ssven2  speak 2 me 03:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "was considered only for her "grind and bump routine" style of acting," -no idea what you mean!
 * "Moondram Pirai depicted a young woman whose mental state regresses to that of a child following an accident. Sexuality and the repression of desire were dominant motifs, similar to Balu Mahendra's previous film Moodu Pani (1980).[" This should all be in present tense as the film still exists.
 * saying that Velu Nayakar came for a "focused purpose",?
 * "Cheenu's attraction to Bhagyalakshmi is reminiscent of Robert Ledgard's (Antonio Banderas) attraction to Vera Cruz (Elena Anaya) in Pedro Almodóvar's Spanish film The Skin I Live In (2011). " How can it be reminiscent of a film released 29 years later?

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Prose could still use a bit of work but it looks OK overall.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)