Talk:Mooning the Cog

GA Review May 3 2008
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

 Spinach Dip  02:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Removed photograph.
I removed the image of the man holding up the citation he received as his full name, address and date of birth, as well as the officer's name is clearly listed on the citation. I am unsure if the original uploader is the individual pictured - it doesn't say on the photograph's upload page. If it is, and he wishes to have this information public, then I see no problem. However, the police officer's name and badge number are clearly listed as well. ExRat (talk) 18:37, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That is a public photo. Under what wiki rule are you removing it? Tmaull (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Re-removed it per WP:IUP Section 11.3 Moral issues "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. The subject's name, address, phone, even part of his social security number is visible, as well as previously stated before, the officer's Name and ID number. The image is now also off of Flickr. Cheers, Mazeau (talk) 23:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

It says that an off-duty state trooper began riding the cog with a Forrest ranger. If the trooper was riding the train for the purpose of arresting the "mooners", how would that classify as off-duty? Parcanman (talk) 02:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)