Talk:Moore's law/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Moore&. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

In order to uphold the quality of Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of August 23, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.


 * I count eight requests for citation in this article, some of them outstanding since August 2007. All citation requests resolved. --Kvng (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * A self-fulfilling prophecy: industry struggles to keep up with Moore's law has been tagged as needing improvement since February 2008. Resolved by previous edits. --Kvng (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The Software: breaking the law section is entirely unsourced. Section no longer exists. --Kvng (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * All of the web sites relied upon as sources need to have last access date and publisher information. Fixed. --Kvng (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * There are two dead links. Fixed. --Kvng (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)