Talk:Morchella rufobrunnea/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 07:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

review  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  07:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Cool...love the img!! Five issues:
 * In Taxonomy; sentence "In a later study by Michael Kuo, he determined that the "winter fruiting yellow morel" found in landscaping sites in the western United States was the same species as M. rufobrunnea." Identify that species.
 * Done. Sasata (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Sentence "Kuo suggests that M. rufobrunnea is the correct name for the M. deliciosa used by western American authors." Hmm...does that mean M. deliciosa had been erroneously named, and/or previously used for deliciosa specimens that should be or were not being considered rufobrunnea? Clarify per ce.
 * Hopefully this makes sense now ... tell me if I'm wrong! Sasata (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Nicely done!! ;) --  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  11:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Epithetons-nous rufobrunnea. ;)
 * Done. Sasata (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Some '&nbsp' are missing.
 * I didn't see any ... Sasata (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Let's stack File:Morchella rufobrunnea 11174.jpg under/over File:Morchella rufobrunnea 183115.jpg; the gray monochrome sort of makes the former lost under the Mycobox. --  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, Done. Sasata (talk) 06:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Good to Go! --  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  11:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Morchella rufobrunnea passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: