Talk:Morden South railway station

Help!
I don't understand how Template:S-line works. Could someone fix it please? The template should say "North Cheam Terminus" on the left.-- Laun chba ller 01:45, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It should say this instead of what? Gryllida (talk) 02:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Now that I'm more awake: ✅. I don't blame you; the template documentation needs rewriting for clarity. How this works for future reference:
 * check the templates that define the termini of the Northern line. Template:S-line/LUL right/Northern redirects to.
 * Edit that page, and you'll see a list of line branches (henceforth "type") and their termini. I'll (try to) explain using the right-hand branch on this page: see how has the parameter and value  ? Now, go back to . See the line  ? That's why the right-hand branch says towards Edgware, Mill Hill East or High Barnet.
 * If the type already exists, you can just put it in the  (or   if you're dealing with a right-hand branch). When I looked, one didn't exist, so I added a type and named it, like so:  . If you ever do so, I advise you follow previous examples on that page and add a comment:.
 * Now that we have the type, we can go ahead and put it in. So now the parameter in reads.
 * Since the values of  in  and of   in  match, the template now shows "Terminus" under "North Cheam" on the left.
 * Hope that helped, somewhat? Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It helped, although it was my understanding that trains would have terminated at Edgware, Bushey Heath or High Barnet and I've just tried to add that to the template and it's coming up redlinked.-- Laun chba ller 19:32, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. Somehow missed the hatnote over at the first time around, but now I know to use . Had to  with Module:Adjacent stations/London Underground before setting up the template here. Maybe slightly less aesthetically pleasing than the old version, but  makes overriding default terminus fields much easier. Begone, redlinks, haha! Anyway, three notes:
 * Based on Module:Adjacent stations and the module's subpages, we have yet to port National Rail (NR) info to the Adjacent stations module. Once that happens, both sets of succession boxes should match in width, which will make it look better. Not a deal killer for me at the moment, though.
 * To the parameters, I appended  . For ease of implementation when someone sets up the NR adjacent stations module; they can just put   and increment the number as needed.
 * I'll undo the changes both of us have made to, since we don't need them anymore and to keep that template neat.
 * Hope that helped! Stay well, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)