Talk:Morea expedition

Good work
This is a very well sourced article that was missing from the Greek War of Independence series. I made a few mainly aesthetic changes and wikilinked a couple of stuff I knew. Good work. NikoSilver 22:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Is land intervention a newspeak word for invasion or military excursion?

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of June 25, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: yes, prose is excellent
 * 2. Factually accurate?: well-sourced
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: complete in all respects
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: no issues of POV
 * 5. Article stability? very stable
 * 6. Images?: all are free or appropriately tagged

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — Argos '  Dad  20:19, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: On Hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Conflicts, battles and military exercises" articles. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed. I have made minor corrections and have included several points below that need to be addressed for the article to remain a GA. Please address them within seven days and the article will maintain its GA status. If progress is being made and issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted. If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Here are the points that need to be addressed: Add inline citations for: Overall, the article was an interesting read and well-sourced. The above issues shouldn't take very long to address and should be easy to fix. Good job on getting so many free images to include in the article. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 01:29, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Single sentences shouldn't stand alone, so statements like "As the gathering process went along, they sent the plants, as well as birds and fish, to France.[46]" either needs to be expanded on or incorporated into another paragraph.
 * 1) "Through this work, he became the first to divide ancient art by periods, classifying works chronologically and stylistically."
 * 2) "Greece became the “motherland of the arts” and “the teacher of taste”."
 * 3) "Later, Capodistria charged Virlet d’Aoust with studying the possibility of cutting a canal across the Isthmus of Corinth."

GAR: Kept
Since the above issues were not addressed, I went through and put the inline citations into hidden comments. If sources are found, they can be removed from the hidden comments. At this time, I believe the article should keep its GA status since it meets the requirements of the GA criteria. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have update the article history to reflect this review. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Intellectual Context: proposed transfer
This article contains a section (Intellectual Context) on the German neo-classicist Winckelmann which is irrelevant. Unless there are any objections, I propose to transfer the section to Neo-Classicism. Please record any response below. EraNavigator (talk) 08:14, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not a long development and it is necessary to understand why a scientific expedition was sent along with the military one. Cedric B. (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that the scientific expedition is adequately explained at the start of the relevant section, as following the model of the Egyptian expedition. The Winckelmann section appears as a digression, with no clear link to what goes before or after. The article is complete without it. EraNavigator (talk) 22:32, 7 September 2008 (UTC) PS: It should also be considered whether the scientific expedition should be split off into a separate article, as it was distinct from the military mission, and started when the latter was already achieved. EraNavigator (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Morea expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20121211100514/http://traumwerk.stanford.edu:3455/multiplefields/360 to http://traumwerk.stanford.edu:3455/multiplefields/360
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040604022515/http://metamedia.stanford.edu/ to http://metamedia.stanford.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)