Talk:Morinda, Inc./Archives/2015

I think it would be ok to take off the advertisement tag
I have done my best to make this article read less like an advertisement and be more NPOV. I think it would be ok to take off the advertisement tag. Epachamo 19:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I have added much additional information regarding possible nutrious value of noni. I do not know either way whether or not the drink is good for you, but I certainly think the possibilities of either side should be presented here. Therefore I have turned this incredibly one-sided, very negative article into something slightly more neutral.

the sloth_monkey 12:12 AM (Central Time) Thursday, April 27, 2006

OK, this article is definitely biased and reads terribly (Not your edits sloth_monkey, but subsequent ones). There has got to be some balance to this article. Epachamo 04:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I just added some legal information. It is a fact that none of the proposed medical or therapeutic effects of noni products has ever undergine a clinical study. If there were some, these products had to be registered as drugs. Since they are not, it is illegal to chalk any medical or therapeutic effect to noni products. The big companies know this very well and dissociate from any medical ot therapeutic claim. But in network marketing many people act totally illegal claiming miracles affected by noni products. The pseudo scientific links an informations in the article do not change anything in this fact. I am missing this clear statement in the article and will add it in the near future. ghw 09:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Not at all. There are a lot of products that have medical effects that are not registered ad drugs. Including all vitamins, chocolate (70%+) and milk. Claiming such effect without evidence however, is false marketing.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.34.41 (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)