Talk:Moro Rock

Merge with Sequoia National Park?
User:Reywas92 merged this article into the National Park article. I've reverted, pending discussion.

Looking at WP:MERGE, I think that this article should be preserved as independent, because:
 * 1) This article could be expanded into a longer standalone article, cross-linked to the NP article
 * 2) Moro Rock is a discrete subject and deserve its own article, even though it is short

Comments? Thoughts? —hike395 (talk) 18:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to expand it, but it is part of the National Park and is not a fully discrete subject. All relevant information is included in this main article, so an independent article would be redundant. Reywas92 Talk 18:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Not all relevant information was in the article: the infobox info and photos were lost. I also expanded the article with geology and recreation. Note that we have many articles about mountains in National Parks: Little Tahoma, Mount Dana, University Peak, etc. The precedent is that mountains deserve separate articles. —hike395 (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)