Talk:Morpholino/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

GA Sweeps: On hold
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to determine if the article should remain a Good article. I believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a GA. However, in reviewing the article, I have found there are several issues that need to be addressed.

I went through the article and made some changes, please look them over. I will leave the article on hold for seven days, but if progress is being made and an extension is needed, one may be given. If no progress is made, the article may be delisted, which can then later be renominated at WP:GAN. I'll contact all of the main contributors and related WikiProjects so the workload can be shared. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) The "Normal gene expression in eukaryotes", "Specificity, stability and non-antisense effects", and "Intellectual property" sections could use additional sourcing.
 * "Normal gene expression in eukaryotes" looks like just a summary of the relevant details of material covered in depth with cites elsewhere. I added a for it. Does it still need a ref here? Could copy over some of the genetics textbooks from Introduction to genetics, but not sure how much/what is appropriate for this type of summary-article-like section. DMacks (talk) 22:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That should be fine. If you want to improve it further, pulling over a few sources from the other article would be better as it would probably keep the reader here instead of branching off to another article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The "Normal gene expression in eukaryotes" section was really intended as a caption for the first gene expression figure; the caption and the figure are there as comparisons with the figures showing changes induced by translaton-blocking or splice-blocking Morpholinos. I think it is entirely appropriate to rely on the other article if a reader wants sources.  This section is just setting the stage for the descriptions of Morpholino activity. JonMoulton (talk) 20:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * "Specificity, stability and non-antisense effects" first paragraph does need cite help. I suspect refs 1 and 2 would be good here. Much of this section seems to be similar to gene knockdown, so refs/material from there could be synced. DMacks (talk) 22:48, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If the cites cover the material, feel free to include them here. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added a few recent citations to this section. JonMoulton (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Although it is not required by GA criteria (so it will not be a requirement for the review), it would be beneficial to add alt text to the images. See WP:ALT for assistance.
 * 2) In the "Intellectual property" section, it only consists of a single sentence. This should either be expanded on or incorporated into another paragraph elsewhere.
 * The patents on the Morpholino structural type expire Feb. 2010. I have removed the intellectual property section. --JonMoulton (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Sweeps: Kept
Good work addressing the issues. I went through and made some minor changes, please review my edits. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)