Talk:Morris–Jumel Mansion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewing this article now. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Nominator:

Reviewer: Cielquiparle (talk · contribs) 21:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Criteria
Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 :</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * Thanks for the comments so far @Cielquiparle. Here are my responses:
 * For citation style, I generally put a cite book or cite report citation in the "Sources" section if two or more page ranges are cited. I've now moved all of the book and report cites to the Sources section regardless of how many times they're cited. All other types of citations remain in the "Citations" section.
 * For the captions, I've added some dates to the captions that didn't have them yet.
 * – Epicgenius (talk) 17:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I will give it a couple more read-throughs and likely pass soon. Your writing in general is so clear I don't really anticipate any issues. But if I had to make a picky comment, it's this sentence I don't like: He entered the house on the night of September 14–15, 1776; the exact date and time of his arrival is unclear. Do you mean the exact time of his arrival is unclear? Or do you mean the date is also unclear because it may have been before midnight or after midnight? If that's the case, I think it's enough to say "time" and not "date" because the date is right there. Otherwise I start wondering if "entering the house" is somehow different in meaning from "arrival", or if he might have arrived on another day completely (date unknown, possibly much earlier) but that the only record we have of his entrance into the house was September 14–15.) Cielquiparle (talk) 20:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)