Talk:Mortuary temple of Hatshepsut

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150314140232/http://www.memphis.edu:80/egypt/westbank3.php to http://www.memphis.edu/egypt/westbank3.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 16:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20131117101240/http://www.kch42.dial.pipex.com/egyptarticle_temple_hatshep.html to http://www.kch42.dial.pipex.com/egyptarticle_temple_hatshep.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

No mention of 1997 Terrorist Attack
Is there any reason for there not to be any reference at all to the 1997 terrorist attack at this site? It was quite "notable". 62 people were killed. At very least it seems there should be mention and link to main article: Luxor massacre --Petzl (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The article has a clearly defined scope. The event has its own article as you've linked. Maybe a link belongs in see also, but otherwise it's an entirely separate topic that isn't discussed in the relevant literature. Mr rnddude (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Conflict between article title and intro
@Mr rnddude: You just reverted my edit, so maybe you could help clarify this. Currently, the article is titled "Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut". The capitalization suggests that this name is a proper noun, which therefore should be used as rendered there. The infobox mirrors this capitalization. However, the introductory sentence renders the name in sentene case, making the article title seem happenstance and not a proper noun. This is a conflict; all three should use the same rendering, as the capitalization in the title effectively suggests the way the article is linked to from others (as seen, for example, at Deir el-Bahari and Luxor massacre).

In related articles (like Great Temple of the Aten, Luxor Obelisks, Tomb of Aegisthus, and Temple of Thutmose III), the titles are consistently presented as proper nouns in all three positions. Since I have no deeper knowledge about this topic (I came here merely to check the capitalization to use in another article I am currently writing), can you clarify whether the name should be a proper noun or not? If it is, the introductory mention should be capitalized as I did; if not, the article should be moved to mortuary temple of Hatshepsut and the infobox adjusted accordingly. Regards, IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * - The easiest way to check whether a term is a proper noun is Ngrams. The majority of sources do not capitalize 'mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' in prose. For that matter, the temple of Thutmose III should also be lowercase. The article should not be moved to 'mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' though, but maybe 'Mortuary temple of Hatshepsut' as the first letter of a title should nearly always be capitalized. Whoever originally created the article used title case, though WP:TITLECASE indicates that titles should also use sentence case. I didn't know that either to be honest, I assumed titles used title case. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Moving the article sounds good. I initiated a page move request. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 14:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)