Talk:Morus australis

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morus australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170525105020/http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf to http://www.forest.go.kr/kna/special/download/English_Names_for_Korean_Native_Plants.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Not Broussonetia papyrifera

 * "Not a true mulberry (i.e. "Plants of the World Online" gives M. australis as a synonym of the accepted taxonomic designation, Broussonetia papyrifera, the paper mulberry),[5]"

Well I visited that reference [5], and there is no mention of Broussonetia papyrifera, which is a very very different tree. Jidanni (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * The indicated reference incorrectly invoked the POWO Morus formosensis page in place of the M. australis page. The POWO M. australis page states "This name is a synonym of Broussonetia papyrifera". The reference has been corrected.
 * Maidenhair (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Need citation for claim of "the majority of Morus species should be considered a subspecies of alba"
Australis has properties that are absent in the vast majority of M. alba species, namely linear veination and a mildly rough surface. While it is true that Morus is an incredibly complex genus, this is a very broad and (imo) highly inaccurate statement that should not be posted without a citation. 2601:14D:4A89:940:9550:A71A:91C:D9A1 (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)