Talk:Moses in rabbinic literature

Failed GA
I have failed this article under WP:GACR criterion 2, because the article is sourced only to itself (Jewish Encyclopedia) and primary sources (Exodus). It would need secondary sources. Also criterion 3b, as the page spends most of its time summarizing what the literature says instead of discussing it. --Alksub 19:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I find the "failed GA" tenuous, specious, sophomoric. Although citing and perhaps remotely resembling the slimmest of criterions, "sourced only to itself", this commentary is tantamount to criticism without ANY additional foundation OTHER THAN the ALLEGED ABSENCE of secondary sources. The article is definitive throughout, giving broad, comprehensive analytics, as well as prolific and extremely well sourced content. The "fail" grade is petty at best, and absent the provision of secondary sources, pretentious, and utterly unambitious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:802A:812C:2D7A:48DF:F887:8F75 (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)