Talk:Moshe Katz (editor, born 1864)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 13:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Happy to take this one on for review. I'll start by giving my notes, then a preliminary check against the GA criteria. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * A couple cases of unclear prose, noted above.
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * Only one issue with a section header.
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
 * A couple cases of inline citations being misplaced, although this has only been a very minor issue with verification.
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * All spotchecks verify the written information.
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Found no cases of copyvio.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * Nominator appears to have found everything there is to find in the English language literature.
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * If anything I think it could add a bit more context in some places.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * No reversions in edit history.
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No images included.
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * Might be worth adding cover images of one or two of the journals/newspapers that Katz worked on? Even a small amount of visual context would be nice, I think.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Article is very close. It appears to be as complete as it'll ever be. I only have a few minor notes that I think are holding this back from a quick pass. Ping me once these are addressed and I'll be happy to take another look. Nice work researching this! --Grnrchst (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Article is very close. It appears to be as complete as it'll ever be. I only have a few minor notes that I think are holding this back from a quick pass. Ping me once these are addressed and I'll be happy to take another look. Nice work researching this! --Grnrchst (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Appreciate the review! Made some edits/replies and I'll look into getting the title page of one of his translations. czar  13:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok! I'm happy to pass this now. Nice work :) --Grnrchst (talk) 14:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)