Talk:Mother India/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Overall, it's fairly well-written, and, after taking some time to look at the sources, most everything seems to be properly verified. I went through and made some minor grammar/punctuation tweaks as well as remove some noun plus '-ing' and other wordy stuff. Just a couple of minor issues before I go ahead and pass for GA:


 * The title of the film is taken from American author Katherine Mayo's 1927 polemical book Mother India, in which she attacked the Hindu society, religion and culture of India. → Did Mayo attack Hindu society and the religion and culture of India? It doesn't readily make sense after reading it. Could you tweak that so that it makes more sense?
 * Part of the major success of the film ... which is relevant to many. → I think that sentence is a bit long and drawn out and couple help readers if that was split into two sentences.
 * In the lead, is there a reason why there are inline citations in the first paragraph and nowhere else (aside from the quote, in which that citation must stay there)? To me that is a little inconsistent per WP:LEADCITE.

On hold pending resolution to the three issues noted above. Otherwise, it's pretty good so far; if you can expand a bit more and tie down all the MoS stuff, this could conceivably make a run for WP:FAC. –MuZemike 20:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Should be fixed now. Thanks for your edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Passed. Everything looks good. –MuZemike 02:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)