Talk:Motion planning

Modifications
I took out a bunch of equations that I thought were a bit too complex.

Also I think someone needs to define low-dimensional and high-dimensional, or substitute layperson language for those terms. Jasemurphy (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but removing information does not make it more accessible. Yes, there will be formulas but that's inherent to the subject. Perhaps someone can discuss it in more detail. Low and high dimensional is not precisely defined but in short, when the number of dimensions increases, the worse it becomes to compute the algorithms. In this discussion, low-dimensional could be read as a dimensional space where computations are still tractable and high-dimensional as one where that is not the case. - Simeon (talk) 06:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Motion planning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101012043033/http://www.abcm.org.br/symposiumSeries/SSM_Vol2/Section_IV_Mobile_Robots/SSM2_IV_05.pdf to http://www.abcm.org.br/symposiumSeries/SSM_Vol2/Section_IV_Mobile_Robots/SSM2_IV_05.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718013412/http://webofthings.com/urban-iot/2010/pdfs/Ball.pdf to http://webofthings.com/urban-iot/2010/pdfs/Ball.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929091715/http://www.researchchannel.org/prog/displayevent.aspx?rID=2132&fID=567 to http://www.researchchannel.org/prog/displayevent.aspx?rID=2132&fID=567

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:10, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Removed Random-MMP section
The edit has removed a subsection from the article. According to my own prediction model, I'm very (>80%) sure that an admin will take action and restore the original content. This is equal to put the section back into the article. The reason is, that the subsection “Random-MMP” was equipped with bibliographic references and improved the article by new insights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManuelRodriguez (talk • contribs) 11:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

I redid the changes of the edit. I was the original author of the edit, but was not logged in. The algorithm, Random-MMP, exists, but the publication has 85 citations (just checked on google scholar). As scientist in robotics, I think this is a good publication, but it is not at the level of the other general methods in this article. This could be misleading for people reading the article to understand the field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmgrober (talk • contribs) 02:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)