Talk:Mott the Hoople

"One-hit wonders"
Who decided that Mott the Hoople qualified as "one hit wonders"? I strongly disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil gosseyn (talk • contribs) 07:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Where do you see this stated ? It is obviously erroneous. RGCorris (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mott the Hoople. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091122121237/http://www.classicrockrevisited.com/concertmott.htm to http://www.classicrockrevisited.com/concertmott.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mott the Hoople. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131103090401/http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/steve-hyams-rip/ to http://www.classicrockmagazine.com/news/steve-hyams-rip/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Band Name in "Timeline"
The entry for the band's name in the "Timeline" section is completely illegible/unintelligible. Perhaps just do it the way the members are listed, where the "name" is color-coded and listed in the color key? 24.151.103.37 (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)