Talk:Motte v Faulkner/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) "Motte v. Faulkner" - OSCOLA standards exclude the full stop. This works with other cases such as "Miller vs. Taylor" further down the page.
 * 2) Miller vs. Taylor should not have "vs" but simply "v". There is no need to de-italicise "v"; again, OSCOLA is against it.
 * 3) Which court issued the injunction and heard the case?
 * 4) Was Miller v Taylor a significant case in its own right, or anything else worth including, or simply a lesser decision that cited Motte?
 * 5) "Lord Chancellor Hardwicke" - "Lord Hardwicke".
 * 6) What is the "Works" case? Ironholds (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This should cover all of the above. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Additional comment, btw; (1741) should be replaced with [1741]. Ironholds (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. I take pride in the fact that so many of the references are titled according to the American standards. Mwah ha ha. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)