Talk:Moula Ali hill

This hill is definitely notable
Of course, this hill is notable and deserves a separate article. Just because some of the content resembles another article's does not mean we should merge this article with it. Thanks Supdiop ( Talk / Contribs ) 14:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * This article is ripped off entirely from another article. This article contains no original contribution. All contents in this article are already covered in the the main article. Hope confusion is cleared.Sarvagyana guru (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I created this article from entirely different sources. This hill article is new, so they covered about this hill in Moula Ali article. Now it has it's own article. Your reason for merge is not correct. No original contribution? Come on. Did you even read all that? I searched for sources for two days and I worked very hard on this article. "This article is ripped off entirely from another article." is not correct. Thank you. Supdiop ( T 🔹 C ) 01:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose merge It's clear the hill is notable on its own. Merging this article into Moula-Ali would overweight that article. --Neil N  talk to me 02:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)