Talk:Mount Bachelor/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 11:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * I'd clarify in the lead that it is considered a "moderate" threat level by the United States Geological Survey.
 * Tephra and Pyroclastic rock are wikilinked, though not at their first instances
 * You mention 'Volcanic bomb' once and then 'lava bomb' later. Is there any difference between the two? I note that 'Lava bomb' just redirects to Volcanic bomb
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Looking forward to passing this once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, Freikorp, thanks very much for the review! I think I addressed your comments.  ceran  thor 15:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Great work. Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 23:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)