Talk:Mount Gareloi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Initial review
This article appears to be at or about the right level for a GA-class article.

Here are my initial comments:
 * I'm not sure that History is a suitable title for the two sentences that it contains, particularly when there is another section called 'Eruptive history'. Perhaps 'Discovery' or 'Discovery of the island' might be a more apt title?


 * The page numbers quoted for the 'Coombs, McGimsey and Browne' in-line citations do not match what is in that paper. They might be pdf file page numbers, but they don't match the page numbers in the article.
 * My computer doesn't let me see those article numbers, I apologize. Would you mind adding them for me? Sorry to be a bother.  ceran  thor 16:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I was just about to do it and then I noticed your remark above.Pyrotec (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅.Pyrotec (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Threat - This is much more 'woolly' than Coombs, McGimsey and Browne. I'm fairly certain that it is not an accurate summary of what they wrote (but I will be checking it).
 * I will get around to rewriting the section today.  ceran  thor 16:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Pyrotec (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

main review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)