Talk:Mount Giluwe

Prominence
Where was this obtained from? Nomadtales 04:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I got the info from Peakbagger. Seattle Skier 09:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

This note was on the page:
 * The prominence is given as 2,507 m, with the elevation of the saddle 1,840–1,880 m, on the

So mountain elevation - optimistic col elevation = clean prominence
 * Peaklist gives: 4367 - 1860 = 2507
 * Peakbagger gives: 4368 - 1880 = 2488

Peaklist uses an pesimistic col elevation which results in an optimistic prominence. WP:MOUNTAINS recommends using clean prominence. I removed the confusing note.&ensp;– droll  &#91;chat&#93;  18:09, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

First ascent
Should this be first recorded ascent? If the climb is nontechnical then it is possible that there was a much earlier native ascent. I don't know how hard the climb is (that's another thing that would be useful here). Comments? -- Spireguy 02:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Giluwe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120217041344/http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130%2F0016-7606(1971)82%5B1605:VAGLOM%5D2.0.CO%3B2 to http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1130%2F0016-7606(1971)82%5B1605%3AVAGLOM%5D2.0.CO%3B2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)