Talk:Mount Smart

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. &mdash;innotata 23:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Mount Smart → Rarotonga / Mount Smart – It appears to be its new official name. Haminoon (talk) 04:25, 11 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose MOS:SLASH we should avoid slashes whenever possible. WP:SUBPAGE this makes the appearance of a subpage, and messes up the associated talk pages, which will assume it is a subpage. Further, per internet wide usage, this is assumed to be a subpage in URL formulations. We can replace it with a DASH, like how other jurisdictions use an mdash. WP:OFFICIALNAMES we don't just use official names because they are official -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 11:23, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Rarotonga is currently in use. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 11:32, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment A slash is allowed "where a slash occurs in a phrase widely used outside Wikipedia, and a different construction would be inaccurate, unfamiliar, or ambiguous"; and we have a precedence with Aoraki / Mount Cook. Generally in NZ the general usage rapidly follows the official name (as we saw with Aoraki / Mount Cook). Haminoon (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Smart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029214620/http://www.linz.govt.nz/sites/default/files/document/nga_mana_whenua_o_tamaki_makaurau_collective_redress_act_2014_registration_guideline_-_current.pdf to http://www.linz.govt.nz/sites/default/files/document/nga_mana_whenua_o_tamaki_makaurau_collective_redress_act_2014_registration_guideline_-_current.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029215200/http://www.linz.govt.nz/nzgb-decisions-september-2014 to http://www.linz.govt.nz/nzgb-decisions-september-2014

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Infobox naming
I've restored the infobox to it's previous state; generally, we lead the infobox with the same name as the article, and use "other_name" for the second most prominent name. BilledMammal (talk) 06:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * MOS:INFOBOXGEO states Infoboxes for geographical items (e.g. cities and countries) should generally be headed with the article title, although the formal version of a name (e.g. Republic of Montenegro at Montenegro) can be substituted. E James Bowman (talk) 06:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * This isn't a formal name, though; it's an official name. Formal names refer to things such as the "Republic of Montenegro", not "Warszawa" or "Rarotonga / Mount Smart". While we discuss, I've reverted the article to the status quo. BilledMammal (talk) 06:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your link refers to country names. Google "formal". The Oxford Languages dictionary definition #2 is "officially sanctioned or recognised". The gazetted official name of this geographical item is the 'formal version of the name'. E James Bowman (talk) 07:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Replied at Talk:Pigeon Mountain (New Zealand). BilledMammal (talk) 09:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I shared about this discussion at New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board. As the identical discussion is happening across three Tūpuna Maunga talk pages, it had been suggested the discussion is taken there. I agree. E James Bowman (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)