Talk:Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (neighborhood)

Requested move 1 July 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move pages. (non-admin closure) —  Young Forever (talk)   15:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

– While the current titles do describe the content of the articles, they are not in accordance with the usual naming conventions. I was rather surprised to find Mount Washington, Pittsburgh is a redlink. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (neighborhood) → Mount Washington, Pittsburgh
 * Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (mountain) → Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)
 * Support per nom, this is similar to Lake Mary, California and Lake Mary (California). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Support Hi, I'm the one who split the article originally (see Talk:Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)). I was not aware of any specific guidelines for titles for pages like these at the time when I split the original page. I would be okay with having them renamed to the correct conventions, though. Are the usual naming conventions you mention the ones here? --Hhm8 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)