Talk:Mountain Pacific Sports Federation

Logos
There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. Johntex\talk 16:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * i added the new logo for the conferenceJaviern (talk) 06:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

teams need to be updated
there are only 31 teams, they should also be in order too —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.27.237.121 (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposal to make timelines more consistent
I noticed that conferences in List of NCAA conferences have articles, usually including a membership timeline. While some of the decisions made for each conference make some sense, there is a wide variety of styles for the various timelines, particularly involving color choices, but also other matters of style that could be more consistent.

for example, a school with a yellow bar means:
 * An associate member in one sport (if part of the BE)
 * A former member of the conference (in the SEC)
 * A future member of the conference (in the SEC and Big West)
 * A football only member (in the Sun Belt)
 * A team that has moved to another conference (in the WAC, NEC)
 * A full member of the Big Sky

Some graphs have captions, some do not, and none are centered. To see the variety of styles, review Current conference timelines

I think it would be worth discussing how best to provide some measure of consistency, recognizing that there may be legitimate reasons for some differences from a standard presentation (for example, some conferences show the name of the new conference for former members. In some cases, this makes sense, in other, it may not.)

I've produced a draft of how the timelines would look with some consistency added. Please see Draft proposal of conference timelines.

I propose a discussion to see if there is consensus on improving the consistency.

Because it would not be practical to have this discussion on each and every conference talk page, I suggest centralizing this discussion at the Talk page of Project College football SPhilbrick  (Talk)  12:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Discussion about overview maps for US collegiate athletic conferences
A discussion on the Project College Football talk page has been created to discuss the proper format of the overview maps that are used for the US collegiate athletic conference pages.

If you're interested, please join the discussion here: Athletic conference overview maps and their lack of consistency. Mdak06 (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Missing three teams
University of Utah are part of the MPSF for women's indoor track and field, University of North Dakota for men's swimming and diving, and University of Wyoming likewise for men's swimming and diving. The table is a little too intimidating for me to edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.160.130.14 (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Ridiculous issue tags
User: James Allison added several issues tags to this list. I take exception to the following two:
 * This article may have too many section headers dividing up its content. (March 2016)
 * This article may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. (March 2016)

I have made only one edit to this list in its entire history, so there's no pride of ownership involved. For a list of this nature, the two "issues" above are patently ridiculous. This is a sports list, for crying out loud. These two tags should be removed. Jeff in CA (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * What is "ridiculous" is claiming this is a list article when it is clearly not. The article should focus on its topic -- the athletic conference -- in an encyclopedic manner, not as a listing of sports results. WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NOTSTATSBOOK, etc. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 05:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Missing State in Map
Indiana and Pennsylvania need added to the infobox map of states who currently have members. Raszoo (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC)