Talk:Mountain View Corridor

Debate
See the current discussion on the updating/expansion of this article here. bob rulz (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Construction update: Utah County Spur
I've been near the Utah County spur, where US-89 and I-15 come together. They have redone the interchange here, the ramps are set up differently and some further construction is ongoing to reconfigure the diamond interchange. However, no evidence of a freeway-to-freeway interchange being started has been seen. The traffic light was moved close to a quarter mile west, the road now curves south and they took out a sod business on the south side of US-89 to do so. A park-and-ride was also demolished, and the stoplight is to the north/west of and closer to the exit point off I-15. If going from northbound US-89 to either direction on I-15 you have to double back and go straight to go south or go under the freeway to go north.

No sign of a route number for this spur is given however. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.23.140.50 (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * A freeway-to-freeway (system) interchange will be constructed at SR-85/I-15/US-89 at full build-out, in future phases. Phase one stipulates that an expressway be built first, with future phases upgrading the route to a freeway. However, that won't come for a while. As for the spur, the route number is just SR-85 as with the rest of the freeway, as indicated by signage on I-15 and signage on the 2100 North spur itself. I emailed UDOT about this and they can't seem to grasp that having the spur and the mainline roadway the same number is a little confusing. CL (T · C) — 21:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a note that the spur will intersect SR-68. I don't know how we'll enter the exit numbers for the mainline and the spur; I guess we'll have to wait until build-out and see how UDOT numbers them.  James L Hutchings (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

2100 North now SR-194
Per the Online Highway Reference interactive map, the 2100 North segment is now SR-194. There isn't a reference PDF or a resolution yet.

Once those sources are out, what should happen with this article? Should a new page be created for the SR-194, or should that information be included in this page? Or should this page be deleted entirely and the information split between SR-85 and SR-194 articles? --Roadguy2 (talk) 00:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The mileage reference PDF for SR-194 is now online . As a result, I've gone ahead and created a draft page for SR-194 in my user space: User:Roadguy2/Utah State Route 194. --Roadguy2 (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)