Talk:Mouse Practice

Proposed deletion
This article was proposed for deletion two minutes after it was created. I believe it should be kept, so have removed the deletion tag. Sure it needs a fair bit of work, but I've seen far less notable articles than this around. I've touched up the lead section a bit, and will come back and do some more on it sometime tomorrow. If anyone still thinks it needs deletion, it will need to go through Articles for deletion. Thanks, --jjron (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * are there any sources for this? While there may be other worse off articles, that argument is invalid. I practiced BEFORE and I couldn't find any RS. I did some searches again and brought up the same result. --Guerillero &#124; My Talk   16:49, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Article expanded. Sources added - they ain't the greatest but better than sources in many other articles. This is something that DID exist and was released on millions of computers, and really should have an article. FWIW I don't really visit there much, but I have answered a question at Reference desk/Computing about this very program (unfortunately at the time we didn't have an article to point to). It may well have been asked about at other times, as it is well remembered. I probably also have some original documentation which could add a further source, but that would be with my old 1994 Mac which is 400km away; might be able to dig that out next time I'm down that way. IMO rushing into instantly deleting newly created good faith articles doesn't do much for Wikipedia or for the newbie experience. And if that means liberal application of WP:IAR, then I'm all for it. --jjron (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)