Talk:Mouse gun

NPOV edit
Edited to provide a NPOV, respecting the beliefs of fans of mouseguns as well as those who do not favor their use. Also, expanded on the differences between mousegun pistols and long guns, namely of the difference in treating caliber vs. size between pistols and rifles when the mousegun terminology is used. Yaf 06:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I know it sounds like I'm just being argumentative, but I've never seen a 9mm referred to as a "mousegun", no matter how small it is. In fact, here is a "Guns Magazine" article claiming the .32 SWL is not a mousegun--with a max power of 122 ft. lb.--well below the .380 ACP's 150+ ft. lb. levels.  Here is an "American Handgunner" article that puts the .32 ACP as the top power mousegun round.  Now I'm not saying the 9mm won't be relegated to mousegun status at some point, as the .32 used to be considered a potent round (see Dr. No, and the argument over .32 ACP vs. 25 ACP) but right now the .380 ACP is what I see as the line.  What the new tiny 9mm pistols have done is begin to push the .380 down to mousegun status:


 * From this:
 * "Challenged on the upper end of the ballistic power spectrum by the new breed of miniaturized service-caliber pistols and on the low end by the mini .32s, the basic blow-back 9xl7mm-- yes, the much maligned .380 ACP-- retains a firm hold on its share of the concealable handgun market.


 * "Advertising hype aside, premium .32 ACP hollowpoints-- at least when fired from pocket pistols-- peak at 95 to 100 ft./lbs. of muzzle energy. Even the more sedate of the .380s top this by more than half and the best performers more than double the energy available from the current generation or mouseguns."


 * This calls the .380 "much maligned as a mousegun", but certainly that wasn't the case a couple of decades ago, before the P-11 and other tiny 9mm guns came out. I'd say the current power ceiling for a mousegun is about 100 ft. lb., with the pocket nines pushing the bar up to 150 ft. lb.


 * scot 14:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * There are several definitions of mousegun that I have seen used over the years. The oldest one I recall, at least among the M1911 45 ACP crowd,  and probably even among the 10mm and .40 S&W crowds, is probably that a mousegun is any pistol firing a bullet in a caliber of .38 or less, at least if it is not in a magnum round.  This definition would also include any 9 mm with a diameter of .355, whether 9mm Kurz (.380 ACP), or a 9mm Makarov caliber in 9x18mm, or even the 9 mm Luger (or Parabellum) caliber (9x19mm).  Incidentally, Brazil took this same .38 definition when they set the limit for the maximum gun caliber that could be carried on an aircraft within Brazil at .38 or less.  Likewise, many law enforcement armament discussions invariably get into whether 9mm is really a service pistol caliber or not, or if it is really a mousegun caliber with inadequate stopping power.  I think we are all in agreement that .32 ACP or smaller caliber cartridges are universally considered mousegun calibers.  However, over the last 10 years, especially, there have been considerable numbers of new, smaller pistols made in the 9mm Luger (9x19mm, 9mm Parabellum) calibers that are also considered mouseguns, based solely on the small size of the pistol. If the pistol works for concealed carry, and is as small as a mouse such as to fit in your pocket, then it should probably be called a mousegun.  For example, see this chart Mousegun.com 9mm Table.  It is a survey of 9mm mouseguns!  As for .380 ACP, is seems to be obsessive to categorize it different than other 9mm rounds;  after all, the .380 ACP is also known as the 9mm Kurz or 9mm Short.  Hence, I think a workable definition for our article would be (at least as of 2006, although it might change in the future, to something slightly larger) using the .38 diameter or smaller caliber argument for defining what a mousegun (pistol) caliber is. This includes the 9mm Luger, as well as the 9mm Kurz (.380 ACP).  It does not include the traditional manstopper round of the 45 ACP, which we can all probably agree is not a mousegun caliber :-)  Should we put in the .38 definition in the article, or is this starting to be too nit-picky?  What say?  Yaf 19:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * "Mousegun" has, from what I've seen, indicated low power as well as small size (otherwise why would the AR-15 be a mousegun?)--the conntation being it's big enough to reliably take down a mouse, but not much else. Airgunners' still use the term mousegun to refer to low powered airguns that are literally used to shoot mice and rats--see the Crosman 2250, marketed in the UK as the "Ratstopper".  No one calls a .45 Colt derringer a "mousegun", even though it's smaller than any .25 ACP in overall size (and has a kick that has to be felt to be understood).  A .22 derringer, on the other hand, I would certainly consider to be a mousegun.


 * I think it can be argued that 9mm is pretty much the definitive service cartridge; NATO uses the 9x19mm (104 years old), and the former Soviet Bloc nations that don't use 9x19 use the 9x18, and I think the Chinese use the 9x18 (plus maybe the 7.62x25mm, which is interchangeable with the .30 Mauser). The .380 is less powerful than any of these, so it can definitively be the "less than service pistol" caliber.  Opinions of what the "not powerful enough" level should be differ widely--the .45 ACP fans are biased against anything smaller than the .45 ACP, the .40 S&W fans against anything smaller than a 9mm; the 10mm fans are biased against anything smaller than .40 or that generates less than 600 ft. lb.  Look around at advice for a "minimum" caliber to carry for defense, and in the 1980's it was always .380 ACP, and began to change to 9x19mm in the 1990's as KelTec, Kahr, etc. got into the picture, with compact short recoil designs that could handle the power.  If you want to put numbers in the article I'd say .32 caliber and 100 ft. lb. is the "traditional" cutoff, but it's moving to .357 and 150 ft. lbs. as pocket guns are starting to show up in bigger calibers.  scot 21:24, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree that .32 ACP was the "traditional" mousegun cutoff, and that then it was the .380 ACP, at least up until the little 9 mm guns came on the scene back around 1995. I also agree that a 45 Long Colt derringer would never have been considered a mousegun, despite the small size of the handgun. (This round, of course, was a traditional black powder manstopper round of the Old West in the 19th Century in the US.)  I suspect that a good bit of this range of opinions may lie in cultural differences, as well, between the gun cultures in the US and among the NATO countries. As I recall, the Italian army and police used the .380 ACP as their service caliber for years. This was while US state police routinely carried .357 Magnums, or .45 ACP in most states. The selection of the 9 mm as the standard service caliber is also still not accepted by the Yanks, at least among several of the US military special forces organizations, nor even among SWAT teams in large US cities, both of whom prefer 45 ACP.  I also recall a rather lengthy discussion in some of the old James Bond books from the early 1960's when Bond finally got a Walther PPK to replace his 25 ACP.  In the US, this was laughable, as no one I knew at the time would ever have considered a 25 ACP as anywhere near adequate for a secret agent :-)  Getting back to the 9 mm discussion for a moment, the mouseguns, with a short barrel length, do not usually develop anywhere near the fpe of full-size service semi-automatic pistols.  The 9mm cartridge is certainly capable of more in longer barrels, but the typical mousegun has simply too short a barrel to develop the full capability of 9x19mm Parabellum (Luger) cartridges.  For this reason, I still think that 9 mm is a good cutoff to be included among mouseguns, especially with the Rohrbaugh, Kel-Tec, etc.  Should we put in a historical discussion of the upwards drift in mousegun caliber choices, or would it be best to simply (albeit somewhat arbitrarily) just go with 9mm without burying readers with all the detail.  There is still the choice I mentioned previously of going with the .38 caliber or smaller definition.  This would include all the 9mm variants, as well as the .357 diameter 38 Specials cartridges.  Yaf 04:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

'Microguns.net' seems to be a search engine masquerading as a website rather than a legitimate forum,50.10.99.70 (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. &mdash;innotata 17:09, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Mousegun → Mouse gun – The term "mouse gun" is more commonly seen as two separate words. Searching Google Books has 251:83 in favor of "mouse gun" and searching Google.com has 48,100:15,900 - both searches seem to show "mouse gun" as two words is roughly 3 times as common. In addition "mousegun" is not officially recognized as a "real word", it is not included in the OED, nor is there any consensus "mousegun" is correct, it cannot be said to be an "official" term. In this case "mouse" functions as an adjective and the more common two-word term should be given preference. Kanadskaja Kazarka (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Is this potentially a case of WP:ENGVAR?--Labattblueboy (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure, I see it the same as the Wondernines article, changed to Wonder Nine as per WP:COMMONNAME Kanadskaja Kazarka (talk) 17:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Support, it seems like two words is more common than one, ONR (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.